The place of green leases in retail
WHAT SIGNIFICANCE WILL THESE AGREEMENTS HAVE IN RETAIL PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE AND HOW CAN THEY BENEFIT OCCUPATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS?
WHAT IS A GREEN LEASE?
While there is not an internationally standardised model of classifying leases as ‘green’, they are broadly understood to refer to a lease or supplementary agreement that includes clauses intended to help manage and improve the environmental and social performance of a building. Green leases are predominantly about a landlord’s desire to reduce their Scope 3 emissions; those outside of their direct control and related to tenant activity. They are intended to influence improvements to energy usage and waste, which if not combatted can negatively impact on a landlord’s ESG credentials, as well as those of the occupier.
Green leases vary in their objectives (see box), but the key components typically require:
- A declaration of commitment by both the landlord and the tenant to operate the building sustainably. This includes things such as reducing energy consumption, emissions, resource and waste.
- An agreement in place that sustainability data will be shared in both directions to facilitate optimal performance.
A green lease can do much more than just improve environmental performance and manage compliance. Using data collection, it has the potential to enhance an organisation’s reputation through benchmarking, improve the wellbeing of the building’s occupants, attract and retain talent through shared core values, and provide assurance for tenants that their ESG priorities will be met.
WHO BENEFITS?
It has been found that the majority of an average commercial building’s greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impacts come from tenantoccupied areas. Therefore, the best way to reduce negative impacts and improve the efficiency and productivity of the whole building is through collaboration between tenant and landlord. Retail tenants with their own ESG policy are likely to want to make improvements anyway, although that doesn’t mean tenants will automatically be compliant.
As well as having their own challenges in reaching a net zero future, retailers continue to face major headwinds that significantly reduce profitability, not least the fact that more than 90% of their emissions are often associated with manufacture, logistics and storage rather than their actual shops. A more environmentally friendly fit-out of their store may have a high cost, but in turn reduce the cost of operating the space; yet the environmental performance of stores might not be at the top of their priority given the investment required to reduce the carbon footprint of their Scope 3/supply chain. Tenants with business rates or service charges may also see this as another financial burden that benefits the landlord more than the tenant.
Green leases have the potential to create advantages for both parties, turning a historically transactional relationship into a supportive and collaborative dynamic, with both parties working collectively to tackle a long-term issue and improve the performance of a building through fostering better communication and providing a platform for discussion.
IMPLEMENTATION REQUIRES COOPERATION
With the occupational market as it is, landlords might, despite best intentions, lack the leverage to install green clauses into new leases should the retailer refuse to agree to them. A landlord’s success rate of implementation could vary significantly by location. Adding these clauses into existing leases could prove even more challenging, particularly when dealing with a multi-tenanted building with different lease lengths. Beginning a process to change the lease of some tenants and not others will have implications for service charges, which are difficult to manage. Furthermore, the protections provided by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 mean that lease renewals must be provided substantially on the same terms as the existing lease, making the introduction of new green lease clauses impossible.
Just how legally binding green leases are remains to be seen. In many cases it might prove to be more about providing a framework within which the landlord and tenant agree to behave. Or perhaps the obligation to co-operate is legally binding, whereas the actual outcome is not. Some of the terms point more to a responsibility to act in as sustainable approach as possible, but the language tends to be flexible on whether this would come at an additional cost to the tenant.
More ambitious green leases might include obligations and targets formalised through Heads of Terms which become legally binding, with a breach resulting in financial penalties or a dispute resolution process. However, even if binding, many ‘green’ clauses may be difficult to enforce. Duties to exercise ‘reasonable endeavours’ and to ‘cooperate’ lack specificity and may not be satisfactorily enforceable in English contract law, and as such are difficult to prove if breached.
Both parties need to buy into the mutual benefits of collaboration. The key obligation from the tenant should be to co-operate with the landlord’s reasonable environmental initiatives aimed at improving the environmental performance of the building, unless this would materially increase the tenant’s costs of operating its business.